The New York Times has published a long analysis of the effects of the hacking of Democratic Party organisations and operatives in the 2016 election campaign.The article is obviously trying continue
Something that’s cropped up a few times with recent discussion of neocameralism as a concept is the role of shareholders in existing firms.Conflicts of interest between principals and agents are continue
Nothing really new here, but pulling a few things together.Start with Joseph K’s observation:Between the replication crisis and the Great Poll Failure of 2016, quantitative social science has basically committed continue
I have long ago observed that, whatever its effect on government, democracy has great entertainment value. We are certainly being entertained by the last couple of days, and that looks continue
In the context of my writing concerning division of power, I want to make a distinction between personal power and collective power.That is not the same as the distinction between continue
No matter how big you grow, you are still vulnerable to a single accident. This includes a single self-inflicted accident.For robustness, growing is helpful but not sufficient. You need to continue
At last I have set the necessary prerequisites to discuss Urielo / @cyborg_nomade’s discussion of constitutions.It is possible I could have been more concise about the prerequisites: what it really continue
In my previous post, I explained why Neocameralism is not a division of power in Montesquieu’s sense, but rather a special case by which the benefits of power can be continue
The latest from cyborg_nomade at antinomiaimediata is a wide-ranging poking at the cracks of the neoreactionary/Moldbuggian concepts of Sovereignty and Responsible Government.As I said on twitter, cyborg_nomade is, from my continue
A commenter again objects to the idea that “left” and “right” is a useful categorisation of political ideas.On the subject of “left” and “right”, there is confusion because I use continue
To set the scene, this is what I think normal politics looks like:There is a kind of dynamic equilibrium of politics under the Modern Structure. The Cathedral moves left at continue
Kicking some ideas around as to what the future of US politics looks like, filling in more detail of my previous predictionThe justification for doing this is to test my continue
By Anomaly UK The ideas that became neoreaction were blogged, but neoreaction as a conscious intellectual movement started on twitter.
I’m not at all sure it could have come about in the same way without twitter. My aim was to speak to the group of people who read and commented on Unqualified Reservations, who continue…
By Anomaly UK A couple of casual online conversations:
First, journalist Jamie Bartlett banging on on Twitter about blockchain.
It became fashionable in 2015 to dismiss bitcoin but get excited about blockchain. I never really got it, because what makes the blockchain work is the fact that there are rewards for building continue…
I’m at a Muslim wedding in a Christian church in NYC, and everyone is dancing to salsa.
America already is great.
That scene may not appeal to everyone: @ClareYChen calls it “a shallow multicultural hellhole where the traditions of different peoples can become continue…
By Anomaly UK On the question of Islamic terrorism in the West, the narrative of the right has been that letting in large numbers of immigrants from Islamic countries is dangerous. The narrative of the left has been that the terrorism is a result of the West’s invasions and destabilising of the Islamic continue…
By Anomaly UK The most pertinent objection from outsiders to anyone advocating neoreactionary, formalist beliefs is that, historically, single-person rule as a mechanism for overcoming politics and discord has been tried, and failed.
Back then, the main threat I was concerned with was state action directed against service providers being used for copyright infringement. Since then, my political views have become more extreme, while continue…
By Anomaly UK I’m following through with my twitter threat to write a piece on Fifty Shades of Grey. I did warn, it will be boring.
What lessons can we learn about human nature, the culture and the media from the success of the books and film?
None. Really, it’s unimportant and irrelevant.
That suggests it’s continue…
By Anomaly UK
The appearance and success of what are called “neoliberal” ideas and policies, mainly during the 1980s but with effects that are still very much with us, exists as a challenge to the neoreactionary observation of the leftward drift, or ratchet.
Cthulu always swims left, Moldbug told us, and Jim explained the “holier-than-Jesus” positive-feedback loop in more detail.
What was Cthulu doing when welfare states were rolled back, government operations privatised, and controls on trade removed from (mainly) 1980-1987? Once awoken, he is not supposed to stop for a bit of a lie down and a nap.
It’s not hard to continue…
By Anomaly UK
Since Spandrell’s celebrated blog postof April 2013, neoreaction has been seen as a trinity, or “trichotomy” of three principles: the Ethno-Nationalist principle, the Techno-Commercial principle, and the Religious-Traditionalist principle.
At a shallow level, neoreaction might appear nothing more than a fragile aggregation of advocates of the three very distinct principles—a coalition of rejectionists of the modern consensus. Most outsiders, and some insiders, have seen it that way, leading to an undercurrent of “fissionism”, of splitting up into three factions.
In spite of that there has always been at the core a dim awareness that the three principles make up continue…
By Anomaly UK
I got in a conversation on twitter yesterday about the choice of the term “Cathedral” to describe the information organs of the modern state: academia and the media.
To those of us that have been around and around this debate for years, it is a bit tedious, and sure enough there were some groans, but I do not apologise. For one thing, nobody who is still paying any attention to Anissimov’s bullshit is in any position to complain about tedious.
The problem with the word Cathedral is that it implies something good, beautiful, admirable. For some Christians, it is an continue…
By Anomaly UK
The previous postwas to say that I see the real division within the Dark Enlightenment as being between a strategy of converting the elite (neoreaction) and a strategy of replacing the elite (paleoreaction).
In America, that might line up somewhat as neocameralismvs monarchy, but that isn’t really the dividing line. There are those supporting monarchism because they can accept nothing else, but there are also neoreactionary monarchists, such as myself, who choose monarchism as strategically preferable to other neoreactionary options.
I concentrate on Britain, and I see monarchist rule as entirely feasible for Britain given any kind continue…
By Anomaly UK
Up until this point, I’ve been careful to avoid arguing against old-style Throne-and Altar reaction. The main reason is that neoreaction and paleoreaction simply aren’t in competition as ideologies: their resemblance in conclusion is a kind of coincidence, as they are built on entirely different premises. Nobody who considers themselves even close to one of them has any possibility of agreeing with the other. Meanwhile, the similarity in conclusions means that neoreactionaries and paleoreactionaries are potential allies in spite of utterly different assumptions, and effort is better expended on creating critiques of one’s enemies than one’s allies.
The reason for continue…
By Anomaly UK Via @EsotericTrad , this utterly loopy piece by Brett Stevens. Apparently, the Dark Enlightenment is all about replacing the elite with people power. Really.
In the “Dark Enlightenment” lexicon, the opposite of the Cathedral is the bazaar. Where the Cathedral is based upon idealized collective issues forced into consensus and acted on by institutions, in other words a classic top-down arrangement, the bazaar is bottom-up and non-organized. It is what happens when people get together and do what makes sense to them without deference to the elites.@EsotericTrad asked whether anyone had ever seen a DE writer mention continue…
By Anomaly UK
The newspapers in Britain are full of something I mentioned as an aside in a post last year—the fact that 1970s consolidation of progressive power was the phase that included the dropping of legalised paedophilia as a progressive goal. The status of the Paedophile Information Exchange as an affiliate of the National Council of Civil Liberties was what I had in mind when I wrote that. It was never any secret.
The establishment line, coming from senior policiticans who shared platforms with paedophile campaigners forty years ago, is that their progressive movements were “infiltrated” by “evil” paedophiles, later driven continue…
By Anomaly UK
@Outsideness asks for a scale-free model of reactionary order. What he means by this is, why do neoreactionaries of the Moldbug variety recommend central authority within a single state, but many small independent sovereign states in the international realm. If one central authority is good for the state, why isn’t it good for the world?
A case for independent sovereign states can be made on ethno-nationalist grounds: there is such a thing as a people, and the customs of one people are not the customs of another people. If another people’s customs are incompatible with my people’s customs, then continue…
By Anomaly UK
One of the problems reactionaries draw attention to, as an example of the ineffectiveness of the modern state, is the threat of crime.
To this, progressives respond with statistics showing that incidences of crime per capita have been on a general downward trend for the last few centuries. Stephen Pinker recently published a book on this point, and anti-reactionaries are, understandably, making a big deal of it.
There are various measurement difficulties with crime rates, but Pinker isn’t a climate scientist, and so it’s not likely that all the measurement errors are going in the same direction.
Are perceptions of continue…
By Anomaly UK
OK, so a couple of outside websites have stirred the murky pool of neoreaction — a welcome development, I think.
Because of the angle they came at it from (via Mike Annissimov, via Scott Alexander), they rather overstated the importance of monarchism to neoreaction. Monarchy is important as a point of comparison, but it is only one possible approach among several for a neoreactionary future.